Last Man on Earth: A New Season Begins

   
Several months ago I wrote about my top 5 favorite TV shows, and Last Man on Earth was on the list. The reason I only put it as my number 4 was because it was only on season 1. I wasn't yet sure if it would still be good after the first season.

     On Sunday, the first episode of season 2 aired. I loved it, though it seemed too short. From the beginning Last Man on Earth was funny. Phil and Carole were back to the relationship they had before things fell apart; arguing over stupid things but overall getting along well. I liked in this episode that they were traveling a lot; driving around town in a plane and even staying in the White House. They even stayed at Carole's old childhood home. I liked that because it showed what Carole's life was like before the virus hit.

     One thing I really like, other than that it's still funny, is the Last Man on Earth is leaving us with questions each week. When will Phil's brother land back on Earth and what kind of trouble will Phil's brother cause? What happened to the others in Tuscon, and mostly, will Phil find Carole?

Colbert's Return

   
     On December 18th, 2014, the popular talk show, Colbert Report, ended it's 9 year run. Like so many, I was sad to see it end. However, Stephen Colbert's fans were excited to know he would be back on TV again as he was to take over the role of host on the Late Show.

     On September 8th, 2015, after almost a year, the wait ended when the first episode of the Late Show with Stephen Colbert aired. So, did it live up to the hype?

     We knew the Late Show would be different than the Colbert Report. It was much more publicized that Stephen Colbert would shed the "conservative" persona he portrayed. We also knew that the Late Show would be more about guest interviews than the Colbert Report was. Still, I was a little disappointed about the lack of political humor. There was some, but not as much as I was used to seeing. And I miss some of the regular pieces, such as "the word". However, in some ways it was just like the Colbert Report. He is still hilarious, and I'm glad he's back.

Provocative Behavior in the Media

     It seems anytime we see a female singer on TV she is scantily clad. Why is it that these woman feel the need to wear provocative outfits and behave inappropriately on stage and in videos? It seems it's becoming more difficult for woman to be a star on pure talent alone.

   
     I think there are female singers who don't behave that way, they just don't get as much attention. We reward female singers with money and publicity for showing bad behavior. As the saying goes, "Any publicity is good publicity". Good behavior isn't newsworthy and so it doesn't get attention. As a result, woman (and men, to a lesser degree) need to keep moving the line to even more inappropriate acts. 

   
     There is, perhaps, no better example of this than Brittney Spears. Several years ago she was going through a serious emotional turmoil, and she was in the media constantly. No sooner she sought the treatment she needed, she got no more attention at all.

   
     There are success stories, though. Taylor Swift, the biggest star in recent years, wore modest outfits and showed class and was still able to climb to the top. It shows that woman with talent and hard work can still find their dream without selling their bodies and souls. Unfortunately, most woman are not able to find that success without exploiting themselves. Woman will continue to flaunt their sexuality for publicity, and media will continue to provide them publicity and fame.

Media's Role in an Election

     When running for elected office, it's good to have publicity. The more familiar voters are with a candidate, the more votes the candidate is likely to get. More publicity means more of a chance to win the election. Media is a very useful way but when they focus on one candidate it isn't fair for the other candidates and the voters.

     For the 2016 election, Donald Trump has been mentioned on the news more times than Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton and any of the other candidates. I know the news needs to be entertaining to get viewers, and Trump is certainly entertaining, but it's important for voters to know every candidate's views on America's issues. Also, when the news focuses on one or two candidates it gives them an unfair advantage because people vote for who they are familiar with. Everyone knows Donald Trump, but many don't even know the other candidates.

     I feel the media should be more balanced with the amount of time they spend on each candidate. I know that Donald Trump is entertaining, but we are looking to elect someone for a very serious job. The media has a responsibility to let voters get to know each candidate instead of just trying to be entertaining.

     Voters have a responsibility to learn every candidate's ideas on issues but voters don't want to spend a lot of time researching information. The media needs to make sure voters get the information they need to make an informed decision.